A journal of IEEE and CAA , publishes high-quality papers in English on original theoretical/experimental research and development in all areas of automation
Volume 10 Issue 3
Mar.  2023

IEEE/CAA Journal of Automatica Sinica

  • JCR Impact Factor: 11.8, Top 4% (SCI Q1)
    CiteScore: 17.6, Top 3% (Q1)
    Google Scholar h5-index: 77, TOP 5
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
C. J. Li and X. F. Zong, “Group hybrid coordination control of multi-agent systems with time-delays and additive noises,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 737–748, Mar. 2023. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105917
Citation: C. J. Li and X. F. Zong, “Group hybrid coordination control of multi-agent systems with time-delays and additive noises,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 737–748, Mar. 2023. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105917

Group Hybrid Coordination Control of Multi-Agent Systems With Time-Delays and Additive Noises

doi: 10.1109/JAS.2022.105917
Funds:  This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62073305), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) (CUG170610)
More Information
  • A new kind of group coordination control problem-group hybrid coordination control is investigated in this paper. The group hybrid coordination control means that in a whole multi-agent system (MAS) that consists of two subgroups with communications between them, agents in the two subgroups achieve consensus and containment, respectively. For MASs with both time-delays and additive noises, two group control protocols are proposed to solve this problem for the containment-oriented case and consensus-oriented case, respectively. By developing a new analysis idea, some sufficient conditions and necessary conditions related to the communication intensity between the two subgroups are obtained for the following two types of group hybrid coordination behavior: 1) Agents in one subgroup and in another subgroup achieve weak consensus and containment, respectively; 2) Agents in one subgroup and in another subgroup achieve strong consensus and containment, respectively. It is revealed that the decay of the communication impact between the two subgroups is necessary for the consensus-oriented case. Finally, the validity of the group control results is verified by several simulation examples.

     

  • loading
  • [1]
    R. Olfati-Saber and R.M. Murray, “Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 9, pp. 1520–1533, 2004. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2004.834113
    [2]
    W. Xiao, L. Cao, H. Li, and R. Lu, “Observer-based adaptive consensus control for nonlinear multi-agent systems with time-delay,” Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 63, no. 9, p. 132202, 2020.
    [3]
    Lin and Y. Jia, “Average consensus in networks of multi-agents with both switching topology and coupling time-delay,” Physica A, vol. 387, pp. 303–313, 2008. doi: 10.1016/j.physa.2007.08.040
    [4]
    W. Yu, G. Chen, M. Cao, and W. Ren, “Delay-induced consensus and quasi-consensus in multi-agent dynamical systems,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I-Regul. Pap., vol. 60, pp. 2679–2687, 2013. doi: 10.1109/TCSI.2013.2244357
    [5]
    T. Li and J. Zhang, “Mean square average-consensus under measurement noises and fixed topologies: Necessary and sufficient conditions,” Automatica, vol. 45, pp. 1929–1936, 2009. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2009.04.017
    [6]
    L. Cheng, Z. Hou, and M. Tan, “A mean square consensus protocol for linear multi-agent systems with communication noises and fixed topologies,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 261–267, 2013.
    [7]
    B. Wang and J. Zhang, “Consensus conditions of multi-agent systems with unbalanced topology and stochastic disturbances,” J. Sys. Sci. Math. Scis., vol. 29, no. 10, pp. 1353–1365, 2009.
    [8]
    Y. Wang, L. Cheng, Z. Hou, M. Tan, H. Liu, and M. Wang, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for solving leader-following problem of multi-agent systems with communication noises,” in Proc. 25th Chinese Control and Decision Conf., 2013, pp. 778–783.
    [9]
    Y. Ni and X. Li, “Consensus seeking in multi-agent systems with multiplicative measurement noises,” Syst. Control Lett., vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 430–437, 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2013.01.011
    [10]
    Y. Zhang, R. Li and G. Chen, “Consensus control of second-order time-delayed multiagent systems in noisy environments using absolute velocity and relative position measurements,” IEEE T. Cybern., vol. 51, no. 11, pp. 5364–5374, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2019.2954623
    [11]
    J. Liu, X. Liu, W. Xie, and H. Zhang, “Stochastic consensus seeking with communication delays,” Automatica, vol. 47, pp. 2689–2696, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.09.005
    [12]
    T. Li and J. Zhang, “Consensus conditions of multi-agent systems with time-varying topologies and stochastic communication noises,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 2043–2057, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2010.2042982
    [13]
    S. Liu, L. Xie, and H. Zhang, “Distributed consensus for multi-agent systems with delays and noises in transmission channels,” Automatica, vol. 47, pp. 920–934, 2011. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2011.02.003
    [14]
    X. Zong, T. Li, and J. Zhang, “Consensus conditions of continuous-time multi-agent systems with time-delays and measurement noises,” Automatica, vol. 99, pp. 412–419, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.04.002
    [15]
    H. Liu, G. Xie, and L. Wang, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for containment control of networked multi-agent systems,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 7, pp. 1415–1422, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.05.010
    [16]
    Z. Peng, J. Hu, and B. Ghosh, “Data-driven containment control of discrete-time multi-agent systems via value iteration,” Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 63, no. 8, p. 189205, 2020.
    [17]
    Y. Lou and Y. Hong, “Target containment control of multi-agent systems with random switching interconnection topologies,” Automatica, vol. 48, no. 5, pp. 879–885, 2012. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2012.02.032
    [18]
    F. Wang, Y. Ni, Z. Liu and Z. Chen, “.Containment control for general second-order multiagent systems with switched dynamics,” IEEE T. Cybern., vol. 50, no. 2, pp. 550–560, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2018.2869706
    [19]
    H. Yang, F. Wang, and F. Han, “Containment control of fractional order multi-agent systems with time delays,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 727–732, 2018. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2016.7510211
    [20]
    D. Wang, D. Wang, and W. Wang, “Necessary and sufficient conditions for containment control of multi-agent systems with time delay,” Automatica, vol. 103, pp. 418–423, 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2018.12.029
    [21]
    K. Liu, G. Xie, and L. Wang, “Containment control for second-order multi-agent systems with time-varying delays,” Syst. Control Lett., vol. 67, pp. 24–31, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2013.12.013
    [22]
    Y. Wang, L. Cheng, Z. Hou, M. Tan, and M. Wang, “Containment control of multi-agent systems in a noisy communication environment,” Automatica, vol. 50, no. 7, pp. 1922–1928, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.automatica.2014.05.018
    [23]
    F. Zhou, Z. Wang, and N. Fan, “Containment consensus with measurement noises and time-varying communication delays,” Chin. Phys. B, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 23–29, 2015.
    [24]
    J. Yu and L. Wang, “Group consensus of multi-agent systems with directed information exchange,” Int. J. Syst. Sci., vol. 43, pp. 334–348, 2012. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2010.496056
    [25]
    J. Yu and L. Wang, “Group consensus in multi-agent systems with switching topologies and communication delays,” Syst. Control Lett., vol. 59, pp. 340–348, 2010. doi: 10.1016/j.sysconle.2010.03.009
    [26]
    L. Ji, Q. Liu, and X. Liao, “On reaching group consensus for linearly coupled multi-agent networks,” Inf. Sci., vol. 287, pp. 1–12, 2014. doi: 10.1016/j.ins.2014.07.024
    [27]
    B. An, G. Liu, and C. Tan, “Group consensus control for networked multi-agent systems with communication delays,” ISA Trans., vol. 76, pp. 78–87, 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.isatra.2018.03.008
    [28]
    Y. Shang, “Group consensus of multi-agent systems in directed networks with noises and time delays,” Int. J. Syst. Sci., vol. 46, no. 14, pp. 2481–2492, 2015. doi: 10.1080/00207721.2013.862582
    [29]
    M. Song, X. Kong, H. Li, and X. Lu, “Asymptotic consensus and asymptotic group consensus of Boolean networks with additive noise,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Information, Cybernetics, and Computational Social Systems, 2020, pp. 531–536.
    [30]
    W. Li, H. Zhang, Y. Zhou, and Y. Wang, “Bipartite formation tracking for multi-agent systems using fully distributed dynamic edge-event-triggered protocol,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 847–853, 2022. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2021.1004377
    [31]
    C. Ma, W. Zhao, and Y. Zhao, “Bipartite consensus of discrete-time double-integrator multi-agent systems with measurement noise,” J. Syst. Sci. Complex., vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1525–1540, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s11424-018-7363-x
    [32]
    L. Pan, H. Shao, Y. Xi, and D. Li, “Bipartite consensus problem on matrix-valued weighted directed networks,” Sci. China Inf. Sci., vol. 64, no. 4, p. 149204, 2021.
    [33]
    X. Dong, Q. Li, Q. Zhao, and Z. Ren, “Time-varying group formation analysis and design for general linear multi-agent systems with directed topologies,” Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 1640–1652, 2017.
    [34]
    D. Meng, Z. Meng, and Y. Hong, “Disagreement of hierarchical opinion dynamics with changing antagonisms,” SIAM J. Control Optim., vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 718–742, 2019. doi: 10.1137/17M1130344
    [35]
    C. Li and X. Zong, “Group consensus of multi-agent systems with additive noises,” Sci. China Inf. Sci., 2022, DOI: 10.1007/s11432-021-3424-x.
    [36]
    X. Ge, S. Xiao, Q.-L. Han, X.-M. Zhang, and D. Ding, “Dynamic event-triggered scheduling and platooning control co-design for automated vehicles over vehicular ad-hoc networks,” IEEE/CAA J. Autom. Sinica, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 31–46, 2022. doi: 10.1109/JAS.2021.1004060
    [37]
    X. Ge, Q.-L. Han, L. Ding, Y.-L. Wang, X.-M. Zhang, “Dynamic event-triggered distributed coordination control and its applications: A survey of trends and techniques,” IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. -Syst., vol. 50, no. 9, pp. 3112–3125, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TSMC.2020.3010825

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (345) PDF downloads(84) Cited by()

    Highlights

    • A new kind of group coordination control problem——group hybrid coordination control is investigated in this paper. The group hybrid coordination control means that in a whole multi-agent system that consists of two subgroups with communications between them, agents in the two subgroups achieve consensus and containment, respectively
    • Using the semi-decoupled skill and some estimation methods, this work provides a new analysis idea to investigate the group hybrid coordination control problem under time-delays and additive noises. Some sufficient conditions and necessary conditions are obtained for this problem
    • The influence mechanism of the communication impact between the two subgroups on group hybrid coordination control problem of MASs with both time-delays and additive noises is revealed: the decay of the communication impact between the two subgroups is necessary for the consensus-oriented case. This provides hints in the design of control gain functions for the similar group coordination control problem

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return